# Forgejo on the Swarm cluster

Runs as `deploy/forgejo/docker-stack.yml` — the only Swarm-scheduled workload
this cluster carries (prod and beta's app stacks are separate `docker stack
deploy`s that happen to run on the manager node, vps2 — see
`deploy/stack/README` context in `DEPLOY.md`). Pinned to the **vps1** node
(`75.119.132.91`) via the `role=forge` label from
`deploy/swarm/label-forge-node.sh`.

The Actions **runner** is deliberately *not* part of this stack — see
`DEPLOY-DEV.md` and the note in `register-lan-runner.sh`'s own header for
where it runs today. That's the canonical placement per
`thermograph-docs/runbooks/implementation-handoff.md` Track B step 5; an
earlier revision of this stack ran the runner as a Swarm-scheduled
Docker-in-Docker sidecar pinned to the Forgejo node, which is gone now.

## Prerequisites

1. All three nodes have joined the swarm (`deploy/swarm/`) and vps1 is
   labeled `role=forge`.
2. `docker node ls` (from the manager, vps2) shows all three `Ready`.

## One-time setup: Swarm secret

One secret the stack expects to already exist (a Swarm secret, not a file —
`external: true` in the stack file, so `docker stack deploy` never creates or
sees the value, only references it):

```bash
# A strong random password for Forgejo's own Postgres (NOT related to
# Thermograph's app database — entirely separate instance/network).
openssl rand -base64 32 | docker secret create forgejo_db_password -
```

## Deploy / update

```bash
docker stack deploy -c deploy/forgejo/docker-stack.yml forgejo
```

Re-running is safe — Swarm only touches services whose spec actually changed.
Do this **before** the DNS + Caddy step below — Caddy's reverse_proxy target
(`127.0.0.1:3080`) needs the `forgejo` service actually listening first, or
its first health check just fails harmlessly until it is.

This stack has **no auto-deploy trigger** — nothing in `.forgejo/workflows/`
redeploys it on push. A change to `docker-stack.yml` only takes effect once
someone re-runs `docker stack deploy` by hand on the manager (vps2).

`db`/`forgejo` both carry `resources.limits` (defaults: db 1 CPU/1g, forgejo 2
CPU/2g — several times observed steady-state usage), overridable with
`FORGEJO_DB_CPUS`/`FORGEJO_DB_MEMORY`/`FORGEJO_CPUS`/`FORGEJO_MEMORY` env vars
before `docker stack deploy`, same convention as the app stack.

## DNS + TLS: reusing vps1's existing Caddy, not a second reverse proxy

Forgejo is pinned to vps1 (`role=forge`) — the same box that also runs
Grafana/Loki/Alloy and the `emigriffith.dev` portfolio site, each fronted by
that host's own Caddy. A second ingress (Traefik) trying to bind the same
ports would collide with it. So there's no Traefik in this stack: `forgejo`'s
web port publishes to `127.0.0.1:3080` only (host-local), and vps1's
*existing* Caddy gets one more site block reverse-proxying to it — same
pattern as its other site blocks, same automatic-HTTPS.

1. Point the Forgejo domain (default `git.thermograph.org`; override with
   `FORGEJO_DOMAIN=...` before `docker stack deploy`) at **vps1's** public IP
   — that's where the task actually runs, not vps2's or the desktop's.
2. Append `deploy/forgejo/caddy-git.conf` to vps1's `/etc/caddy/Caddyfile`,
   adjusting the domain if you didn't use the default, then `systemctl reload
   caddy`.
3. That file also resolves the registry-exposure hazard (#15 in
   `thermograph-docs/runbooks/hop1-forgejo-registry-cutover.md`): `/v2/*` (the registry
   API) is blocked to everything except the WireGuard mesh CIDR
   (`10.10.0.0/24`); the git/web UI stays public. CI runners and Swarm nodes
   reach the registry over the mesh, not the public internet — see "Registry
   access from mesh clients" below.

## Registry access from mesh clients

Any node that needs `docker login`/push/pull against the registry (the CI
runner building/pushing images, any Swarm node pulling them, prod or beta on
vps2 pulling app images) must reach `git.thermograph.org` **over the
WireGuard tunnel**, not vps1's public IP — otherwise Caddy's `/v2/*` block
above refuses the connection. Public DNS resolves the domain to vps1's public
IP, so add a `/etc/hosts` override on each such node pinning it to vps1's
WireGuard address instead:

```
echo "10.10.0.2 git.thermograph.org" | sudo tee -a /etc/hosts
```

(`10.10.0.2` is vps1's WG address per `deploy/swarm/README.md`'s peer
numbering — adjust if you assigned it differently.) The git/web UI keeps
working normally for everyone else since only `/v2/*` is restricted.

## Register the Actions runner

Once Forgejo answers at its domain:

```bash
# On the runner host (see DEPLOY-DEV.md for where that is today):
#   Forgejo web UI -> Site Administration -> Actions -> Runners -> Create new Runner
#   (or, for a repo-scoped runner: <repo> -> Settings -> Actions -> Runners)
#   copy the registration token, then:
bash deploy/forgejo/register-lan-runner.sh https://<forgejo-domain> <token>
```

See that script's header for exactly what it replaces (the pre-Forgejo GitHub
self-hosted runner) and why it registers with two labels where there used to
be two separate runners.

`config.yaml`'s `runner.capacity` is raised from the tool's default of 1 to 8
(override with `CAPACITY=`) — a single PR push fires `pr-build`,
`secrets-guard`, and `shell-lint` simultaneously (3 independent workflows,
no `needs:` between them), so capacity 1 serializes work that could run in
parallel, and even capacity 3 (an earlier, undocumented hand-tune) leaves
`build-backend`/`build-frontend`/`validate-observability` queued behind
those three before they get a slot.

**Adding more runner capacity should mean raising this number, or adding a
second runner alongside it — not putting a runner on prod or beta (vps2).**
`container.docker_host: automount` gives job containers the *host's* Docker
socket; on vps2 that would mean any CI job has root-equivalent access to both
the prod and beta stacks running there. An earlier revision of this stack
actually ran the runner as a Swarm-hosted container on the box Forgejo was
pinned to and was deliberately reverted for this same class of reason — see
the note at the top of `docker-stack.yml`.

## Custom CI job image (`ci-runner/`)

`ci-runner/Dockerfile` still bases on `node:20-bookworm` — Node is a hard
requirement, not leftover: Forgejo's runner executes `actions/checkout@v4`
(used by every workflow) as `node dist/index.js` *inside the job container*,
regardless of whether the workflow itself uses npm/node. (v1 of this image
tried a Node-free Debian-slim base and broke every job's checkout step —
`node: executable file not found` — within a minute of going live; reverted
immediately.) What it actually fixes: every `docker`-labeled build-push job
currently re-installs the Docker CLI on each run (`apt-get install
docker.io`), which pulls in the classic builder rather than BuildKit (the
classic builder mishandles `COPY --chown=<name>` group resolution — a real
bug hit during the frontend Go rewrite). `ci-runner` adds `docker-ce-cli` +
`docker-buildx-plugin` (BuildKit) on top of the same Node base, plus
`git`/`python3`/`python3-yaml` for the other jobs that need them
(`shell-lint`, `observability-validate`).

Current tag: `git.thermograph.org/emi/thermograph/ci-runner:v2` (`v1` is
broken — do not register any runner against it). Rebuild/push (requires a PAT
with `write:package` scope — the embedded git-remote token lacks it, same
requirement documented in `build-push.yml`):

```bash
docker build -t git.thermograph.org/emi/thermograph/ci-runner:vN deploy/forgejo/ci-runner
docker push git.thermograph.org/emi/thermograph/ci-runner:vN
```

`register-lan-runner.sh`'s `LABELS` default points at the current tag, so
fresh registrations pick it up automatically. The live runner is cut over by
editing the `labels` array in `~/forgejo-runner/.runner` on the runner host
(same runner id/token, no re-registration needed) and restarting the service —
**verify a real job runs green under the new image before relying on it**,
same way v1's break was caught. Only after that verification should the
now-redundant `apt-get install docker.io` / `python3-yaml` steps be removed
from the workflows that had them — removing them first would break every job
still running on the stock `node:20-bookworm` image.

## Why Postgres here and not the Thermograph app's TimescaleDB

Separate instance, separate network (`forgejo_net`, not the app's overlay
network), separate volume. Forgejo is a distinct product with its own schema
and its own backup/restore lifecycle — sharing a database with the app would
couple two things that should be able to fail, migrate, and restore
independently.

## Verifying

```bash
docker service ls                       # forgejo_db, forgejo_forgejo both Running, 1/1
curl -I https://git.thermograph.org/    # 200, valid cert (Caddy's, not a new one)
curl -I https://git.thermograph.org/v2/ # 403 from anywhere off the WireGuard mesh
# On the runner host, after registering the runner:
systemctl --user status forgejo-runner   # active, both labels registered
```

## Rollback / removal

```bash
docker stack rm forgejo
# volumes (forgejo_data, forgejo_db, ...) survive a stack rm — remove them
# explicitly only if you actually want to destroy the Forgejo instance's data.
```
