provision-env-db: revoke PUBLIC connect on the owner database too #108
2 changed files with 50 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -149,8 +149,16 @@ it. That guard is why the superuser check above should never fail; run it
|
|||
anyway.
|
||||
|
||||
If the first command SUCCEEDS, stop. `CONNECT` was not revoked and beta would be
|
||||
able to read production data; re-run the provisioning script and re-check before
|
||||
going further.
|
||||
able to open a session against the production database; re-run the provisioning
|
||||
script and re-check before going further.
|
||||
|
||||
This is not hypothetical — it happened on the live cutover. The first version of
|
||||
the script revoked `PUBLIC` connect on the *guest's* database only, and a fresh
|
||||
Postgres database carries `=Tc` (TEMP **and** CONNECT) for `PUBLIC`, so
|
||||
`thermograph_beta` could still reach `thermograph`. The script now hardens the
|
||||
owner's database too, granting the owner's read-only role an explicit `CONNECT`
|
||||
first so the revoke cannot strip `ops/dbq.sh` of its access. The check above is
|
||||
what caught it.
|
||||
|
||||
**Rollback:** `DROP DATABASE thermograph_beta; DROP ROLE thermograph_beta;` —
|
||||
prod is unaffected either way.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -156,6 +156,46 @@ ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES FOR ROLE :"role" IN SCHEMA public
|
|||
GRANT SELECT ON SEQUENCES TO :"rorole";
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
|
||||
# --- harden the OWNER environment's database too -------------------------------
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Revoking CONNECT from PUBLIC on the guest's own database is only half the job,
|
||||
# and the missing half is the half that matters. A fresh Postgres database
|
||||
# carries `=Tc` for PUBLIC — TEMP *and* CONNECT — so the moment a second role
|
||||
# exists on the instance, that role can connect to every database that still has
|
||||
# the default. Provisioning beta and stopping here left `thermograph_beta` able
|
||||
# to open a session against prod's database; caught live by the runbook's own
|
||||
# isolation check, which is why that check exists.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Order matters: grant the owner's read-only role an EXPLICIT connect first, so
|
||||
# the revoke below cannot strip the ad-hoc query path (ops/dbq.sh) of its access.
|
||||
# The owner's app role is the database owner and a superuser, so it is unaffected
|
||||
# either way.
|
||||
OWNER_DB=$(
|
||||
# shellcheck disable=SC1090 # sourced above; re-resolving prod in a subshell
|
||||
thermograph_topology prod >/dev/null 2>&1
|
||||
printf '%s' "$TG_DB_NAME"
|
||||
)
|
||||
OWNER_RO=$(
|
||||
thermograph_topology prod >/dev/null 2>&1
|
||||
printf '%s_ro' "$TG_DB_USER"
|
||||
)
|
||||
# Restore this run's environment — thermograph_topology overwrote the TG_* vars.
|
||||
thermograph_topology "$ENV_NAME"
|
||||
|
||||
if [ "$OWNER_DB" != "$TG_DB_NAME" ]; then
|
||||
echo "==> Hardening the owner database '${OWNER_DB}' against PUBLIC connects"
|
||||
docker exec -i "$DB_CID" \
|
||||
psql -v ON_ERROR_STOP=1 -U thermograph -d postgres \
|
||||
-v ownerdb="$OWNER_DB" -v ownerro="$OWNER_RO" <<'SQL'
|
||||
-- Only if that read-only role actually exists (it predates this script).
|
||||
SELECT format('GRANT CONNECT ON DATABASE %I TO %I', :'ownerdb', :'ownerro')
|
||||
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM pg_roles WHERE rolname = :'ownerro')
|
||||
\gexec
|
||||
|
||||
REVOKE CONNECT ON DATABASE :"ownerdb" FROM PUBLIC;
|
||||
SQL
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
echo "==> OK: ${TG_DB_USER} owns ${TG_DB_NAME} (timescaledb enabled, PUBLIC revoked)"
|
||||
echo " Verify isolation:"
|
||||
echo " docker exec $DB_CID psql -U ${TG_DB_USER} -d thermograph -c 'select 1' # must FAIL"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue