4dcd6775c4
All checks were successful
secrets-guard / encrypted (pull_request) Successful in 5s
shell-lint / shellcheck (pull_request) Successful in 7s
PR build (required check) / changes (pull_request) Successful in 19s
PR build (required check) / build-backend (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / build-frontend (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / validate-observability (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1s
Sync infra to hosts / sync-beta (push) Has been skipped
Sync infra to hosts / sync-prod (push) Has been skipped
Sync infra to hosts / sync-centralis (push) Has been skipped
secrets-guard / encrypted (push) Successful in 6s
Sync infra to hosts / sync-dev (push) Successful in 12s
shell-lint / shellcheck (push) Successful in 8s
A fresh checkout had no working path to the stack locally. Neither compose file carries a `build:` for backend or frontend -- each ships as its own registry image -- so with no image present `make dev-up` fell through to pulling the `:local` tag, which nothing publishes, and failed with 403 against a registry a laptop has no login for. `install` builds both images from backend/Dockerfile and frontend/Dockerfile under exactly the tag the compose files default to; `up` verifies they exist and says what to run instead of retrying the pull. Image names are read back from `docker compose config --images` rather than restated here, so an org rename cannot leave this file building a tag nothing runs. infra's dev-up/dev-down now set COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME=thermograph-dev, which matches deploy/deploy-dev.sh and what the root CLAUDE.md already described; a local run previously landed in the prod-shaped `thermograph` project. Drop dev-up's `--build`, a no-op since the Dockerfiles moved out of infra, and correct the comment claiming a 0.0.0.0 default -- the overlay has published on loopback since dev moved to a public VPS. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .claude | ||
| .forgejo/workflows | ||
| backend | ||
| docs/onboarding | ||
| frontend | ||
| infra | ||
| observability | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| CUTOVER-NOTES.md | ||
| Makefile | ||
| README.md | ||
thermograph
The Thermograph monorepo — the split repos reunified (2026-07-22) with full history via subtree merges, while keeping everything the split was actually for: per-domain images, per-domain deploys, and an async FE/BE contract.
Domains
| Dir | What | CI |
|---|---|---|
backend/ |
FastAPI graded-climate API, accounts, notifications (Discord bot, push, mail), data pipeline | build-push → image jinemi/thermograph/backend; deploy |
frontend/ |
Public client: static JS/CSS + SSR pages | same build-push / deploy workflows, matrixed by domain; image jinemi/thermograph/frontend |
infra/ |
Compose (dev, on vps1) + two Swarm stacks co-resident on vps2 (beta, prod), deploy scripts, terraform, SOPS secrets vault, ops cron | infra-sync (host checkout + secrets render), secrets-guard, ops-cron |
observability/ |
Loki + Grafana + Alloy stack | observability-validate |
thermograph-docs deliberately stays its own repo (ADRs + runbooks, no
build artifacts, different change cadence).
New here?
docs/onboarding/ is the developer onboarding
path: orientation, verified local-setup recipes, a per-domain deep dive, the
cross-service contracts that break silently, the release flow, and a list of
which docs in this repo are currently stale.
How CI stays decoupled
Every workflow in .forgejo/workflows/ is path-filtered to its domain: a
push touching only frontend/** builds/deploys nothing else. Images stay
separate (jinemi/thermograph/backend, jinemi/thermograph/frontend, each tagged
sha-<12hex>), deploys stay per-service (infra/deploy/deploy.sh SERVICE=backend|frontend|all), and the API version contract
(GET /api/version, PAYLOAD_VER) still lets FE and BE ship out of lockstep.
The one intentionally coupled piece is pr-build.yml: a single always-running
gate required check that builds only the domains a PR touches (a
path-filtered required check would deadlock auto-merge).
Branch model (unchanged from the split era): PRs → dev, main → beta,
release → prod. Infra isn't environment-staged the same way app images are:
beta's and prod's checkouts (both on vps2) track main; dev's checkout (on
vps1) tracks dev itself, since it's the one environment that isn't a
rehearsal for something downstream.
Before pointing anything live at this repo, read CUTOVER-NOTES.md.