|
All checks were successful
secrets-guard / encrypted (pull_request) Successful in 5s
shell-lint / shellcheck (pull_request) Successful in 8s
PR build (required check) / changes (pull_request) Successful in 13s
PR build (required check) / build-backend (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / build-frontend (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / validate-observability (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / gate (pull_request) Successful in 1s
secrets-guard / encrypted (push) Successful in 5s
shell-lint / shellcheck (push) Successful in 7s
Protection an admin walks through is documentation rather than a control, so apply_to_admins goes on — but that removes the direct-push route for everyone, including in an emergency, and the way back in should be written down before it is needed rather than improvised. There is no force flag; the supported route is lift the rule, act, restore it, with both halves audited. Names the failure mode that actually justifies it: a renamed status context makes the required check unsatisfiable, and with apply_to_admins on that blocks every merge into dev and main with no exemption for anyone. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| hooks | ||
| BRANCHING.md | ||
| ownership.md | ||
| settings.json | ||