fd12ad6740
All checks were successful
PR build (required check) / changes (pull_request) Successful in 14s
secrets-guard / encrypted (pull_request) Successful in 10s
shell-lint / shellcheck (pull_request) Successful in 11s
PR build (required check) / build-backend (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / build-frontend (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / validate-observability (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / gate (pull_request) Successful in 2s
Forgejo now allows only squash and fast-forward-only, so the three method= calls in this file named styles the API rejects: rebase for feat->dev, and merge commits for both promotions. An orchestrator following them gets a 405. The fast-forward paragraph said adopting ff-only 'needs a one-time reconciliation of the protected branches, which is the owner's decision'. That decision was taken and the reconciliation done — the trees were already identical, so it carried no content. release subset-of main subset-of dev now holds and promotions land the branches on the same SHA. The paragraph keeps the structural explanation, since it is what makes the failure mode recognisable, and now points at reconciliation as the remedy. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .claude | ||
| .forgejo/workflows | ||
| backend | ||
| docs/onboarding | ||
| frontend | ||
| infra | ||
| observability | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| CUTOVER-NOTES.md | ||
| Makefile | ||
| README.md | ||
thermograph
The Thermograph monorepo — the split repos reunified (2026-07-22) with full history via subtree merges, while keeping everything the split was actually for: per-domain images, per-domain deploys, and an async FE/BE contract.
Domains
| Dir | What | CI |
|---|---|---|
backend/ |
FastAPI graded-climate API, accounts, notifications (Discord bot, push, mail), data pipeline | build-push → image jinemi/thermograph/backend; deploy |
frontend/ |
Public client: static JS/CSS + SSR pages | same build-push / deploy workflows, matrixed by domain; image jinemi/thermograph/frontend |
infra/ |
Compose (dev, on vps1) + two Swarm stacks co-resident on vps2 (beta, prod), deploy scripts, terraform, SOPS secrets vault, ops cron | infra-sync (host checkout + secrets render), secrets-guard, ops-cron |
observability/ |
Loki + Grafana + Alloy stack | observability-validate |
thermograph-docs deliberately stays its own repo (ADRs + runbooks, no
build artifacts, different change cadence).
New here?
docs/onboarding/ is the developer onboarding
path: orientation, verified local-setup recipes, a per-domain deep dive, the
cross-service contracts that break silently, the release flow, and a list of
which docs in this repo are currently stale.
How CI stays decoupled
Every workflow in .forgejo/workflows/ is path-filtered to its domain: a
push touching only frontend/** builds/deploys nothing else. Images stay
separate (jinemi/thermograph/backend, jinemi/thermograph/frontend, each tagged
sha-<12hex>), deploys stay per-service (infra/deploy/deploy.sh SERVICE=backend|frontend|all), and the API version contract
(GET /api/version, PAYLOAD_VER) still lets FE and BE ship out of lockstep.
The one intentionally coupled piece is pr-build.yml: a single always-running
gate required check that builds only the domains a PR touches (a
path-filtered required check would deadlock auto-merge).
Branch model (unchanged from the split era): PRs → dev, main → beta,
release → prod. Infra isn't environment-staged the same way app images are:
beta's and prod's checkouts (both on vps2) track main; dev's checkout (on
vps1) tracks dev itself, since it's the one environment that isn't a
rehearsal for something downstream.
Before pointing anything live at this repo, read CUTOVER-NOTES.md.