infra/deploy/forgejo/README.md

@@ -177,14 +177,48 @@ parallel, and even capacity 3 (an earlier, undocumented hand-tune) leaves
 `build-backend`/`build-frontend`/`validate-observability` queued behind
 those three before they get a slot.
 
-**Adding more runner capacity should mean raising this number, or adding a
-second runner alongside it — not putting a runner on prod or beta (vps2).**
-`container.docker_host: automount` gives job containers the *host's* Docker
-socket; on vps2 that would mean any CI job has root-equivalent access to both
-the prod and beta stacks running there. An earlier revision of this stack
-actually ran the runner as a Swarm-hosted container on the box Forgejo was
-pinned to and was deliberately reverted for this same class of reason — see
-the note at the top of `docker-stack.yml`.
+**This paragraph used to say a runner must never go on vps2. That was reversed
+deliberately on 2026-08-01, and the reasoning is worth keeping rather than
+quietly deleting.**
+
+The original objection stands on its merits: `container.docker_host: automount`
+gives job containers the *host's* Docker socket, so a runner on vps2 means any
+CI job has root-equivalent access to both the prod and beta stacks running
+there. An earlier revision of this stack ran the runner as a Swarm-hosted
+container on the Forgejo node and was reverted for the same class of reason.
+
+What changed is that the alternative turned out to be worse. The desktop was
+the estate's **only** registered runner, and when it went offline on
+2026-07-31 nothing merged, nothing deployed, and the nightly backup did not
+fire for 21 hours — on a repo where every branch is protected and every change
+is a PR, a single absent runner freezes the whole estate. Availability of CI
+is not a convenience here; it is what the backup and the deploy path both
+hang off.
+
+So the runner on vps2 (`runner-vps2/`) is a considered trade, not an
+oversight, and it is bounded rather than assumed benign:
+
+- `capacity: 1` — one job at a time, so a CI burst cannot contend with
+  `thermograph_web` for the box's six cores.
+- `--cpus=2 --memory=4g` on job containers, set in `container.options`. Job
+  containers are siblings of the runner rather than children, so the runner's
+  own compose limits do not reach them; that option is the only lever that
+  does.
+- `valid_volumes: []` — a job cannot bind-mount a host path, which is the
+  difference between "a job can read `/etc/thermograph.env`" and "a job
+  cannot", on the box where that file is prod's.
+- The compose project joins no `thermograph` network.
+
+Be honest about what that buys: it is defence against **accident**, not
+against a hostile workflow author. Forgejo's own database on vps1 already
+stores `VPS2_SSH_KEY`, which is root on vps2, so the material was already
+reachable — what changed is that it is now reachable by a *job* rather than
+only at rest. On a two-person estate where both people can already SSH to that
+box as root, that is the honest boundary.
+
+**If you are adding capacity rather than redundancy, raise `capacity` or add a
+runner on a box that hosts nothing.** The vps2 runner exists so that CI has a
+second home, not because prod is a good place to run CI.
 
 ## Custom CI job image (`ci-runner/`)