33cd69e44e
All checks were successful
PR build (required check) / changes (pull_request) Successful in 8s
secrets-guard / encrypted (pull_request) Successful in 6s
shell-lint / shellcheck (pull_request) Successful in 6s
PR build (required check) / build-backend (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / build-frontend (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / validate-observability (pull_request) Has been skipped
PR build (required check) / gate (pull_request) Successful in 2s
shell-lint failed on two single-quoted strings. Both are deliberate and double-quoting either one would break it silently rather than loudly. In render_centralis_secrets, the verification step runs `bash -c 'set -a; . "$1"'` with the rendered file passed as an argument. The "$1" must be expanded by that inner shell. Double-quoted, it would interpolate the OUTER $1 — the function's own first argument, the repo root — so the check would source the wrong path and still report success. That check exists precisely to catch a bad render, so a false pass there is worse than no check. In verify-centralis-render.sh, the string is executed by the REMOTE shell over ssh. Double-quoted, mktemp would run locally and the script would send the host a path that does not exist there. Suppressed with the reason at each site rather than loosened globally. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0182KTMrsTHJc3TcewCatJFY |
||
|---|---|---|
| .forgejo/workflows | ||
| backend | ||
| frontend | ||
| infra | ||
| observability | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| CUTOVER-NOTES.md | ||
| README.md | ||
thermograph
The Thermograph monorepo — the split repos reunified (2026-07-22) with full history via subtree merges, while keeping everything the split was actually for: per-domain images, per-domain deploys, and an async FE/BE contract.
Domains
| Dir | What | CI |
|---|---|---|
backend/ |
FastAPI graded-climate API, accounts, notifications (Discord bot, push, mail), data pipeline | backend-build-push → image emi/thermograph/backend; backend-deploy[-prod|-dev] |
frontend/ |
Public client: static JS/CSS + SSR pages | frontend-* mirrors of the above; image emi/thermograph/frontend |
infra/ |
Compose, deploy scripts, terraform, SOPS secrets vault, ops cron | infra-sync (host checkout + secrets render), secrets-guard, ops-cron |
observability/ |
Loki + Grafana + Alloy stack | observability-validate |
thermograph-docs deliberately stays its own repo (ADRs + runbooks, no
build artifacts, different change cadence).
How CI stays decoupled
Every workflow in .forgejo/workflows/ is path-filtered to its domain: a
push touching only frontend/** builds/deploys nothing else. Images stay
separate (emi/thermograph/backend, emi/thermograph/frontend, each tagged
sha-<12hex>), deploys stay per-service (infra/deploy/deploy.sh SERVICE=backend|frontend|all), and the API version contract
(GET /api/version, PAYLOAD_VER) still lets FE and BE ship out of lockstep.
The one intentionally coupled piece is pr-build.yml: a single always-running
gate required check that builds only the domains a PR touches (a
path-filtered required check would deadlock auto-merge).
Branch model (unchanged from the split era): PRs → dev, main → beta,
release → prod; infra tracked via main on all hosts.
Before pointing anything live at this repo, read CUTOVER-NOTES.md.